Today as our nation stands as one grieving, hoping, and praying for those in Minnesota, I need to talk about something very near and dear to my heart. Many of you may not understand why I write this blog. I began writing because we live in a nation that promises dignnity for all. We live in a country that says, "if you work hard you can achieve anything." The reality of this country is however, somewhat different to that dream.
There are homeless people on the streets. There are people with cancers of all types who suffer daily. There are people like myself who are willing to work; willing to make a difference in the world but whose physical limitations are seen by society as an excuse for this country and others not to expect anything from its citizens with disabilities and that my friends, is what gives us our disabilities in the first place. And that's why although I have cerebral palsy, I was not born with any "disability" but rather, was placed at a disadvantage because of a lack societal expectations for people like me. "We'll give you money every month as long as we're not expected to help you do anything with your life." That's the general attitude of our country and many others. You want a good economy? Give people the tools necessary to contribute to that economy. My friends, we are a potentially great people. The creativity of the human race is astounding! Today I ask you, if we aren't taking care of each other; aren't trying to make the world better than it was when we got here, what are we doing?
We know that there's a hole in the ozone layer that's making it difficult for people to breathe. We know it's impacting our entire ecosystem and what, I ask you, are we doing about it? Nothing! You see, to me technology isn't about the latest operating system or the coolest new gadget.! It's about solving problems! What are we doing about the environment? Nothing! We know we could make hybrid cars mandatory, but we are far too concerned about profit. And this attitude is prevalent throughout society regardless of the problem in question. Don't believe me?
We knoww that there are not enough support staff to take care of the elderly and people like myself in the coming years and what are we doing about that? Nothing! We allow people to go into nurrsing homes at the age of 25 if necessary so that we do not haave to deal with spending the money to solve the problem. Dignity is not profitable. What are we doing about the elderly and people in my situation? Nothing! We know that investments in robotics could provide new treatments for people with disabilities and while there are places of ongoing research surrounding this idea, generally, what are we doing about this? Nothing! Need another example of our lack of concern for those in need?
May I direct your attention to Minnesota? There are bridges that have collapsed. We knew that they were in trouble and who do we see about that? How do we stand up and say that we're not going to allow this kind of thing anymore? We need to remind our elected officials that they are just that, elected officials. The people in power both locally and in Washington, work for the American people. What does all this have to do with technology? The point is that we have the technological and financial resources available to solve almost any problem. Sometimes I wonder if we truly have the willpower.
I write about technology to demonstrate to others what can happen when technological genius is applied to everyday problems. I'm not concerned with who makes money. I'm concerned with making the world better until something better comes along. That's the only way that there will ever be dignity for all.
03 August, 2007
21 July, 2007
IPhone goodness
Okay, before you write this post off as another fan boy review, let's get a few things straight. I'm not a fan boy of anything. I don't care who makes your computer: it's still a computer. I write this blog because I believe that we need to start looking at technology as a tool to address our limitations. By the way, we all have limitations whether we were born with them or not. My interest in technology is not to say, "this company is better than that company". I'm far more interested in looking at a particular problem such as my inability to dial a traditional cell phone without making my fingers scream for mercy, figuring out the best solution to address my problem and then, getting the appropriate software and/or hardware in place. I don't choose a wheelchair based on who the manufacturer is! I buy a chair because after doing my research; and that's important; the particular model I finally choose is the most appropriate one for my daily living. We really need to get to a point where we choose PCs the same way. I have cerebral palsy, as most of you know and consequently, I run a large mixture of devices and software. Some of it's from Microsoft, and some is from Apple and likewise, some of my most important software is from companies that neither Apple nor Microsoft may not have heard of. And that's the way it should be. Always remember that PCs whether they run Windows or OS X, should do what you the consumer need them to. If you tried to reverse that, everything falls apart. Therefore, it's not about company loyalty. It's about solving problems efficiently and getting things done in a way that makes sense for each individual user. Now class, does anyone actually remember what the term PC stands for? Anyone... anyone...? Personal computer. If the device/computer/operating system you're using right now doesn't work for you, you need to do two things.
1. Research what works the way you would like to.
2. Demand better software. Really take the time to think about what you'd like your software to do and exactly in what manner you would like to achieve that. Be specific and tell the PC manufacturers/software giants your ideas. They really do want constructive feedback. Most importantly though, remember, these devices are supposed to be designed to make you and I more productive in the ways that We need them to. Not all devices/computers/operating systems work best for all people. But today, I'd like to discuss one device that has made a difference to me: the iPhone.
I have been using this device for a little while now andI could go into great detail about why it's easier than any other traditional cell phone I've tried, but I think the best way to really make the point is with a little story. I wake up one morning; morning ritual of checking e-mail after getting out of bed and surfing the tech news sites as breakfast is being prepared by my morning PCA (personal care assistant) when, something on the Apple site catches my eye. Steve Jobs keynote from MacWorld is available on demand. So after I finish all my morning activities such as dressing, eating, and of course, visiting the restroom, my staff person can leave for the morning and I am free to watch the keynote. I make it a point to always watch keynotes and product launches from both Microsoft and Apple or for those of you that like to quibble over semantics, Apple and Microsoft :-). So I'm expecting Steve to discuss the latest iMac or PowerBook and what's he talking about instead? A cell phone. Okay," I thought, "Apple is going to release another cell phone that I will never be able to use." Then, Steve begins to describe the user interface saying, "we're going to touch this with our fingers". I was intrigued. Then he demoed the device. It wasn't the touch screen iPod that sold me, although that's awesome. It wasn't the SMS messaging that sold me. Why would I use any kind of keyboard ever?! Being able to flick through photos with your finger is pretty cool, but that's not what sold me. You want to know what sold me on the iPhone? I'm sure it will surprise you :-). It's the ability to make calls without ever having to dial a phone number.My particular case of CP impacts my dexterity and fine motor control and as a result, dialing a long number is extremely difficult. When I saw Steve make a phone call in about three taps of his finger, I was hooked. I knew this was an answer from abovve. I call my mother at her work immediately to share my excitement. She diddn't quite understand exactly what I was talking about the next day when she came to help me in the afternoon, I showed her the keynote. I was all set to try to explain why this device was going to be helpful when after we had been watching the presentation for a few moments, she turned to me saying, "you'd better save up to get one because you need it." Those of you who don't know my mother may not understand that she's not like me. I understand technology at a very high level she understands why some technology can be helpful, she usually requires that I explain why and exactly how it will be helpful to me. Not so with the iPhone. And I have to tell you, that's amazing.
So how is the phone in reality? Wonderful. Be careful not to assume that because I said it's wonderful that it's also perfect. We do after all, need something to shoot for in version 2.0 :-). If you're blind, at the moment, you're not really going to be able to use the iPhone. That will come, I'm sure. Apple does make one of the best integrated screen reading systems I've seen in the opeerating system. It's called voice over, and it's included with OS X. so I don't think it will be too long before we see some kind of implementation of the same technology on the iPhone. The phone is TTY compatible with an adapter (purchased separately through the Apple store). The touch screen is terrific. I can't speak for everyone with cerebral palsy because it impacts everyone differently but for me, the iPhone is able to interpret my gestures nearly perfectly. Most of the "buttons" are large and friendly and easy to tap and over time, because the buttons are all virtual, I believe we will see some way to make them even larger for those that need such things. In the meantime, iPhone 1.0 is a promising beginning that is changing the way I use a cell phone. For the first time in my life, I have been able to set up my own voicemail on a cell phone. I'm musing about 90% of the applications available on the phone which is, light years ahead of what I did on my old phone. There, I used about .1% of the phone capabilities because the buttons which were physical button, were so smaall! The iPhone is different. It's not perfect. It's not fair that those who are blind can't use the phone now, for instance! But the phone is so simple and so elegant to use. It works the way I think about computers and mobile devices. When I think of computers and other smart devices, I do not visualize myself interacting with them using a keyboard and mouse. That's just not the way I work. I may have trouble pushing tiny little plastic buttons on most cell phones, but the iPhone allows me to just tap the one finger; it doesn't matter which finger; to get everything I need. II do have two important complaints about the iPhone, and here they are.
1.the virtual keyboard does work well for a keyboard, but why is there a keyboard at all? Apple spent all this time developing a beautiful touch screen interface and yet... you still have to use a keyboard (albeit virtual) for e-mail? Why?? Where is the dictation engine for e-mail? They say iPhone runs OS X. Okay boys and girls, if the iPhone does indeed run OS X, where is the speech recognition for e-mail? I realize that the "Apple speakable items" is only for command-and-control speech recognition, but my point still stands.
2.the iPhone cost $499 for the 4 GB model. That of course, doesn't include the two-year contract with AT&T. The 8 GB model is $599. Again, that's before a two-year service agreement. The iPhone is a very important device and whether the initial version in usable to you or not, the innovations introduced in the phone will impact everything. I believe that this is the most user-friendly mobile phone (for consumers) ever made. But if we're going to get it to people with disabilities like myself, over all, the price of the unit needs to come down.
The iPhone does work as advertised. It does so even for me for the most part without mistakes. And I know that because this is the initial release, the software will only get better from here.
1. Research what works the way you would like to.
2. Demand better software. Really take the time to think about what you'd like your software to do and exactly in what manner you would like to achieve that. Be specific and tell the PC manufacturers/software giants your ideas. They really do want constructive feedback. Most importantly though, remember, these devices are supposed to be designed to make you and I more productive in the ways that We need them to. Not all devices/computers/operating systems work best for all people. But today, I'd like to discuss one device that has made a difference to me: the iPhone.
I have been using this device for a little while now andI could go into great detail about why it's easier than any other traditional cell phone I've tried, but I think the best way to really make the point is with a little story. I wake up one morning; morning ritual of checking e-mail after getting out of bed and surfing the tech news sites as breakfast is being prepared by my morning PCA (personal care assistant) when, something on the Apple site catches my eye. Steve Jobs keynote from MacWorld is available on demand. So after I finish all my morning activities such as dressing, eating, and of course, visiting the restroom, my staff person can leave for the morning and I am free to watch the keynote. I make it a point to always watch keynotes and product launches from both Microsoft and Apple or for those of you that like to quibble over semantics, Apple and Microsoft :-). So I'm expecting Steve to discuss the latest iMac or PowerBook and what's he talking about instead? A cell phone. Okay," I thought, "Apple is going to release another cell phone that I will never be able to use." Then, Steve begins to describe the user interface saying, "we're going to touch this with our fingers". I was intrigued. Then he demoed the device. It wasn't the touch screen iPod that sold me, although that's awesome. It wasn't the SMS messaging that sold me. Why would I use any kind of keyboard ever?! Being able to flick through photos with your finger is pretty cool, but that's not what sold me. You want to know what sold me on the iPhone? I'm sure it will surprise you :-). It's the ability to make calls without ever having to dial a phone number.My particular case of CP impacts my dexterity and fine motor control and as a result, dialing a long number is extremely difficult. When I saw Steve make a phone call in about three taps of his finger, I was hooked. I knew this was an answer from abovve. I call my mother at her work immediately to share my excitement. She diddn't quite understand exactly what I was talking about the next day when she came to help me in the afternoon, I showed her the keynote. I was all set to try to explain why this device was going to be helpful when after we had been watching the presentation for a few moments, she turned to me saying, "you'd better save up to get one because you need it." Those of you who don't know my mother may not understand that she's not like me. I understand technology at a very high level she understands why some technology can be helpful, she usually requires that I explain why and exactly how it will be helpful to me. Not so with the iPhone. And I have to tell you, that's amazing.
So how is the phone in reality? Wonderful. Be careful not to assume that because I said it's wonderful that it's also perfect. We do after all, need something to shoot for in version 2.0 :-). If you're blind, at the moment, you're not really going to be able to use the iPhone. That will come, I'm sure. Apple does make one of the best integrated screen reading systems I've seen in the opeerating system. It's called voice over, and it's included with OS X. so I don't think it will be too long before we see some kind of implementation of the same technology on the iPhone. The phone is TTY compatible with an adapter (purchased separately through the Apple store). The touch screen is terrific. I can't speak for everyone with cerebral palsy because it impacts everyone differently but for me, the iPhone is able to interpret my gestures nearly perfectly. Most of the "buttons" are large and friendly and easy to tap and over time, because the buttons are all virtual, I believe we will see some way to make them even larger for those that need such things. In the meantime, iPhone 1.0 is a promising beginning that is changing the way I use a cell phone. For the first time in my life, I have been able to set up my own voicemail on a cell phone. I'm musing about 90% of the applications available on the phone which is, light years ahead of what I did on my old phone. There, I used about .1% of the phone capabilities because the buttons which were physical button, were so smaall! The iPhone is different. It's not perfect. It's not fair that those who are blind can't use the phone now, for instance! But the phone is so simple and so elegant to use. It works the way I think about computers and mobile devices. When I think of computers and other smart devices, I do not visualize myself interacting with them using a keyboard and mouse. That's just not the way I work. I may have trouble pushing tiny little plastic buttons on most cell phones, but the iPhone allows me to just tap the one finger; it doesn't matter which finger; to get everything I need. II do have two important complaints about the iPhone, and here they are.
1.the virtual keyboard does work well for a keyboard, but why is there a keyboard at all? Apple spent all this time developing a beautiful touch screen interface and yet... you still have to use a keyboard (albeit virtual) for e-mail? Why?? Where is the dictation engine for e-mail? They say iPhone runs OS X. Okay boys and girls, if the iPhone does indeed run OS X, where is the speech recognition for e-mail? I realize that the "Apple speakable items" is only for command-and-control speech recognition, but my point still stands.
2.the iPhone cost $499 for the 4 GB model. That of course, doesn't include the two-year contract with AT&T. The 8 GB model is $599. Again, that's before a two-year service agreement. The iPhone is a very important device and whether the initial version in usable to you or not, the innovations introduced in the phone will impact everything. I believe that this is the most user-friendly mobile phone (for consumers) ever made. But if we're going to get it to people with disabilities like myself, over all, the price of the unit needs to come down.
The iPhone does work as advertised. It does so even for me for the most part without mistakes. And I know that because this is the initial release, the software will only get better from here.
06 July, 2007
IPhone: my expectations
Well, I did it. I ordered my iPhone. I am so excited by this product and at the moment though I'm also a little annoyed. I'm not annoyed with Apple at all. They've made a great product. Yes, it is fair to say that this is a first-generation iPhone and so as with all these things, there will be further advancements in each subsequent generation. I'm annoyed by the mainstream press. I hear people saying, "Oh, there's not a "real" keyboard on the iPhone, so you can't type the way you should. Why do we live in a society that is populated by people who insist on injuring themselves by trying to type on devices that are so small and impractical to be used for that purpose? Let me ask you something. Would you consider trying to send a text message on your telephone at home? No, of course not. You'd use your computer. I hear some of you saying, "Yeah, but I need to be able to check my e-mail when I'm not near my computer." Fair enough, but if you can afford the over $5-$600 price tag for an iPhone, you can certainly afford to buy a laptop/notebook. Why do I hate the idea of text messaging on a phone? Here's the thing. As someone who has seen far too often what carpal tunnel and other disfiguring ailments can do, I'm against using any device that will perpetuate that. Speech recognition works! It's real and any notebook that you buy today can run speech recognition software in most cases. If you want to use your cell phone to do text messaging, that's fine. But unless you use something that is speech driven, it's never going to be an ideal experience. It's going to be difficult at times and you will eventually get arthritis or carpal tunnel from doing that! It's that simple. As I've said before, speech recognition is not perfect. But it will learn and adapt with proper use and correction. We really need to stop expecting devices like cell phones in their current form factors to be suitable for e-mail. They're never going to be as nice or as comfortable as a PC or Mac, period.
So what are my expectations for the iPhone? Why am I getting one? It's simple. I have difficulty dialing a regular phone but, I can simply tap on a name and dial the number. That's what's important to me about the iPhone and that alone, could save me from harm when I'm outside. The iPod is also really cool and I hear a lot of people complaining that it doesn't have enough storage capacity. Okay, I will admit that it could be a little bigger when it comes to storage size, but consider that each of my Old Time Radio shows are ripped at 48 kb a second, which is more than adequate for something that was not originally produced in stereo. These files are typically 26 to 29 minutes in length and are between 10 and 15 MB in size, depending on the file format you use. Even audio books are perfectly acceptable at 48 kb a second, which means on a 4 GB iPhone I can dedicate two GB to iPod media and still have plenty of room.
Am I saying that the iPhone is perfect? Of course I'm not saying that. Inevidetably when I get it, I will notice things that I would like to change. Will I be doing any Internet surfing with the iPhone? In a pinch, I suppose I could browse my bookmarks, but there's no way I'll be using the iPhone as an alternative to browsing the web.
So what are my expectations for the iPhone? Why am I getting one? It's simple. I have difficulty dialing a regular phone but, I can simply tap on a name and dial the number. That's what's important to me about the iPhone and that alone, could save me from harm when I'm outside. The iPod is also really cool and I hear a lot of people complaining that it doesn't have enough storage capacity. Okay, I will admit that it could be a little bigger when it comes to storage size, but consider that each of my Old Time Radio shows are ripped at 48 kb a second, which is more than adequate for something that was not originally produced in stereo. These files are typically 26 to 29 minutes in length and are between 10 and 15 MB in size, depending on the file format you use. Even audio books are perfectly acceptable at 48 kb a second, which means on a 4 GB iPhone I can dedicate two GB to iPod media and still have plenty of room.
Am I saying that the iPhone is perfect? Of course I'm not saying that. Inevidetably when I get it, I will notice things that I would like to change. Will I be doing any Internet surfing with the iPhone? In a pinch, I suppose I could browse my bookmarks, but there's no way I'll be using the iPhone as an alternative to browsing the web.
04 June, 2007
Someone at Microsoft must want an iPhone. Microsoft Surface announced.
If you haven't, please read my last entry on the iPhone. If it wasn't made clear by that entry, I am very impressed with the iPhone! With the small addition of a simple to purchase waterproof sleeve to protect the touchscreen, the iPhone shouldn't be just a solution I need to alleviate the problems I encounter in using a cell phone. Hallelujah! :-)
Also in my previous entry, I discussed Microsoft's plans for the telephone of the future. Recently, Microsoft announced a breakthrough in touch computing technology that will enable such devices as the phone I just mentioned. This is a technology that the software giant has dubbed Microsoft Surface. Surface is an amazing to see. It's a touch technology that can be built into a desk, a table or any other surface of the kind. Presumably, this is where Microsoft got the name. Original little buggers, aren't they? :-) surface will change how easily people can interact with computers. Why do we need a new way to interact with our PCs?
Anyone who has been working in an office for several years can answer this question. Anyone with fine motor problems can answer this question. Anyone with arthritis or carpal Connell or repetitive stress injury in their hands knows the answer to this question. Keyboards caused pain. It's that simple! But Microsoft Surface isn't just about providing another tablet PC like user interface. The tablet PC is still based on an operating system (Windows) that was originally designed to be used with the keyboard. Surface represents as Monty Python would say, "something completely different". What makes it so different? Surface is aware of physical objects. For example if you put down a paintbrush on the desk or table enabled with this technology, it knows what it is. It looks at the object and sets to itself, "oh, this is a paintbrush. You most want to do some artwork. So I'll provide a clear surface and a color palette for you to use with this subject." So if you want to paint, all you have to do is touch the paintbrush to the table and began painting. Tired of that? You can use the same table or desk to do many other things. Don't take my word for it, watch these demos.
See what's coming? See why I'm so enthusiastic? If you think this is just some clever flash animation demo, Microsoft has been demonstrating Surface for a while. Most recently, they demonstrating at WinHEC
Also in my previous entry, I discussed Microsoft's plans for the telephone of the future. Recently, Microsoft announced a breakthrough in touch computing technology that will enable such devices as the phone I just mentioned. This is a technology that the software giant has dubbed Microsoft Surface. Surface is an amazing to see. It's a touch technology that can be built into a desk, a table or any other surface of the kind. Presumably, this is where Microsoft got the name. Original little buggers, aren't they? :-) surface will change how easily people can interact with computers. Why do we need a new way to interact with our PCs?
Anyone who has been working in an office for several years can answer this question. Anyone with fine motor problems can answer this question. Anyone with arthritis or carpal Connell or repetitive stress injury in their hands knows the answer to this question. Keyboards caused pain. It's that simple! But Microsoft Surface isn't just about providing another tablet PC like user interface. The tablet PC is still based on an operating system (Windows) that was originally designed to be used with the keyboard. Surface represents as Monty Python would say, "something completely different". What makes it so different? Surface is aware of physical objects. For example if you put down a paintbrush on the desk or table enabled with this technology, it knows what it is. It looks at the object and sets to itself, "oh, this is a paintbrush. You most want to do some artwork. So I'll provide a clear surface and a color palette for you to use with this subject." So if you want to paint, all you have to do is touch the paintbrush to the table and began painting. Tired of that? You can use the same table or desk to do many other things. Don't take my word for it, watch these demos.
See what's coming? See why I'm so enthusiastic? If you think this is just some clever flash animation demo, Microsoft has been demonstrating Surface for a while. Most recently, they demonstrating at WinHEC
25 May, 2007
Cell phone problems. Apple providing a possible solution?
First, let me apologize for being gone for so long. I have been involved in several new beta projects which I'm not allowed to discuss at the moment. In addition, a slight accident with my wheelchair meant that I had to wait for my mouth to heal from nearly splitting my lip. During that time as you can imagine, it was very difficult to use my computer, as I could not talk well enough to utilize my speech recognition.
In any event, I'm back now and ready to begin posting once again.
Lately we've been focusing on Windows Vista. As things develop and I'm allowed to discuss the beta projects I've been helping with in more detail, we'll be covering Windows further. There are some potentially exciting developments in this area. For the moment however, it's time to turn our attention to Apple. Yes, I said Apple. Although it may be difficult to tell from this blog, I really do like Apple and its approach to computing. No, I'm not saying that they always have appropriate solutions for my situation, but their approach to what a computer should be is sometimes refreshing. More importantly, that approach influences the rest of the computer industry. One only has to look at how elegantly beautiful Windows Vista really is compared to say Windows 3.1 to see that Apple's influence is keenly felt.
Anyone reading this knows that the cell phone has revolutionized (sometimes for better and sometimes for worse) the way people communicate. I myself carry a cell phone when I go outside in case of situations like the one I mentioned at the top of this page. Cell phones are wonderful devices that have been made possible by the evolution of the microprocessor. Therein boys and girls, lies the issue with cell phones when it comes to accessibility. Microprocessors mean a micro-phone. Micro-phones mean big headaches for those of us with fine motor control problems. Sure, my cell phone is small enough to fit in my nasal cavity, but it's impossible to dial! Sure, the phone has the capability to do text messaging, but the keyboard is so small that you'd need to be a member of that famous cartoon singing group "the Chipmunks" in order to be able to send such a message successfully! At the Windows hardware engineering conference (WinHEC), Microsoft demonstrated the capabilities of tomorrow's telephones. If you're elderly, why should you have to look through a phone book to find what you need? The phone book really should be part of the phone. You should be able to go up to a large screen device and say literally, "I am looking for a plumber in my area. I'm willing to pay between X. and Y. Could you please provide me with a list?" After scanning the list and finding the one you'd like to call, you should just be able to touch the name on the screen and call that person. I know. I hear you saying, "it's just as easy to look it up." Wrong! It's not easy. If you have difficulty dialing a cell phone because of fine motor problems, you have no chance of using the phone book. Yellowbook.com is a good start, but it doesn't go far enough in alleviating the problem. So while Microsoft works out what to do about your telephone, Apple has a potential solution for the cell phone. That's right, it's the iPhone.
At MacWorld, Steve Jobs' keynote was primarily devoted to the iPhone. Why do I care about the iPhone? What's the big deal? The big deal is that this is unlike any cell phone available right now. The entire phone is a touchscreen. I can see some of you shrugging that off. But think for a moment. Think of the implications of that. If the entire device is a touchscreen, that means buttons that are actually easy to see! That means a contact list that's actually usable! Text messaging may still require to much dexterity for me to use effectively but just the promise of a usable cell phone is enough to get me excited. Still not sure why? Watch the introduction of the iPhone for yourself. Now as to how sensitive the screen will be, no one knows. It is possible that I'll have to use a stylus in conjunction with the phone to get the appropriate control. Either way, this is a great potential solution to a very real problem and I will certainly have more on this topic when the iPhone is released. In the meantime, I hope this entry shows that technology isn't just about computers. It's about solutions to everyday problems. And over the next few weeks, I'll be covering issues like this. So stay tuned.
In any event, I'm back now and ready to begin posting once again.
Lately we've been focusing on Windows Vista. As things develop and I'm allowed to discuss the beta projects I've been helping with in more detail, we'll be covering Windows further. There are some potentially exciting developments in this area. For the moment however, it's time to turn our attention to Apple. Yes, I said Apple. Although it may be difficult to tell from this blog, I really do like Apple and its approach to computing. No, I'm not saying that they always have appropriate solutions for my situation, but their approach to what a computer should be is sometimes refreshing. More importantly, that approach influences the rest of the computer industry. One only has to look at how elegantly beautiful Windows Vista really is compared to say Windows 3.1 to see that Apple's influence is keenly felt.
Anyone reading this knows that the cell phone has revolutionized (sometimes for better and sometimes for worse) the way people communicate. I myself carry a cell phone when I go outside in case of situations like the one I mentioned at the top of this page. Cell phones are wonderful devices that have been made possible by the evolution of the microprocessor. Therein boys and girls, lies the issue with cell phones when it comes to accessibility. Microprocessors mean a micro-phone. Micro-phones mean big headaches for those of us with fine motor control problems. Sure, my cell phone is small enough to fit in my nasal cavity, but it's impossible to dial! Sure, the phone has the capability to do text messaging, but the keyboard is so small that you'd need to be a member of that famous cartoon singing group "the Chipmunks" in order to be able to send such a message successfully! At the Windows hardware engineering conference (WinHEC), Microsoft demonstrated the capabilities of tomorrow's telephones. If you're elderly, why should you have to look through a phone book to find what you need? The phone book really should be part of the phone. You should be able to go up to a large screen device and say literally, "I am looking for a plumber in my area. I'm willing to pay between X. and Y. Could you please provide me with a list?" After scanning the list and finding the one you'd like to call, you should just be able to touch the name on the screen and call that person. I know. I hear you saying, "it's just as easy to look it up." Wrong! It's not easy. If you have difficulty dialing a cell phone because of fine motor problems, you have no chance of using the phone book. Yellowbook.com is a good start, but it doesn't go far enough in alleviating the problem. So while Microsoft works out what to do about your telephone, Apple has a potential solution for the cell phone. That's right, it's the iPhone.
At MacWorld, Steve Jobs' keynote was primarily devoted to the iPhone. Why do I care about the iPhone? What's the big deal? The big deal is that this is unlike any cell phone available right now. The entire phone is a touchscreen. I can see some of you shrugging that off. But think for a moment. Think of the implications of that. If the entire device is a touchscreen, that means buttons that are actually easy to see! That means a contact list that's actually usable! Text messaging may still require to much dexterity for me to use effectively but just the promise of a usable cell phone is enough to get me excited. Still not sure why? Watch the introduction of the iPhone for yourself. Now as to how sensitive the screen will be, no one knows. It is possible that I'll have to use a stylus in conjunction with the phone to get the appropriate control. Either way, this is a great potential solution to a very real problem and I will certainly have more on this topic when the iPhone is released. In the meantime, I hope this entry shows that technology isn't just about computers. It's about solutions to everyday problems. And over the next few weeks, I'll be covering issues like this. So stay tuned.
20 March, 2007
Windows Vista and Speech Recognition
Hi, I'm back. It's Finally time for the long promised discussion on speech recognition.
What speech recognition is and is not.
Gene Roddenberry first introduced the general public to the notion of talking to computers in September of 1966. The crew of the Starship Enterprise enjoyed flawless voice driven interaction with the ship's computer. The system never made mistakes; required correction during the dictation of a log entry, or, seemed to need any special maintenance of any kind. It could be used by voice by many different people simultaneously. Those of you who know me, know that I'm into science fiction. You may not however, understand exactly why.
Growing up as someone with cerebral palsy, I had to face many limitations. Although I can paint and draw fairly well, my brain injury makes writing physically difficult, laborious, time consuming, and, eligible. My vision problem, which is also caused by my CP, makes driving a car both impractical and unsafe. The welfare system and social structures in place in our society today mean that our government neither expects or demands much from its disabled citizens. "As long as you just want to sit home and play with your Xbox and don't demand much out of life, we'll keep sending you money but don't expect much else from us in the way of help." This seems to be the general attitude of those in power. I assure you though, that this is only due to a lack of knowledge.
Star Trek and other shows like it show us the way things must become. In star trek for example, Geordi Laforge may be blind, but he has been provided with the appropriate technology to overcome his limitations. He wasn't expected to pay for it. The appropriate piece of technology was simply provided to him that might become a more productive member of society. Moreover, as chief engineer of the USS Enterprise D., Laforge is expected to perform his duties regardless of any limitations he might have had at birth. His crew mates expect this of him and he in turn demands this of himself. In the world of Star Trek, no one drives. They simply have a way to transport everyone safely and conveniently. In Doctor Who, if the Doctor meets someone with three heads and six arms, he's not going to say " oh god, you have three heads and six arms!" He's more likely to simply say " lovely to see you again. I haven't seen you in so long!" And that's why I watch science fiction. I'm not always interested in who's attacking our heroes this week. Although I do enjoy a good story, I'm interested in the technological and sociological messages behind these things. I don't mind telling you that I believe in miracles and I wait expectantly for the manifestation of life altering, liberating technologies.
When I was young, speech recognition was just such a technology; something to be reached for; a potential solution to my problems, but nothing more.
Today, we have speech recognition technology, but what is it really like? Does it match up to the vision holdout by Star Trek? We are getting there. Right now though, all speech recognition technology works by analyzing sound waves. It also to looks at the surroundings sentences and judges the statistical likelihood that certain words will appear next to each other. The effect of this is as if the system is playing charades. Let's say that your dictating a sentence in a letter and you want to write a sentence that says, " john, I'll meet you there." The minute you start speaking, these speech recognition software is attempting to judge exactly what it was you said. It has fractions of a second to do this because you're obviously going to want to dictate something else or go to another program, etc. So the first thing the software does is say to itself, " I noticed the name John several times in this letter. So I'd have to guess that's who this is for. And then it sounds like he dictated something that sounds like I'll eat new where." Speech recognition systems only learn to improve by proper correction. It is therefore, extremely important to follow the appropriate correction method so that the software learns from its mistakes. Otherwise, it will never improve! This isn't Star Trek! Speech recognition systems require ongoing correction to learn. It is not teaching the software anything for you to simply highlight the misunderstood text and type in the corrections by hand. Although most software packages can learn from document analysis, the best way to teach speech recognition software is to make corrections by voice. This is after all, speech recognition software and therefore it needs to hear the appropriate things to tell it that it's made mistakes! Only in this way will the software ever improve! I cannot stress this enough! When you buy and or use speech recognition software, ask for training on how to use the software appropriately. Take any tutorials that come with the software until you feel comfortable using it. Learn the appropriate correction commands! Most importantly, understand that working with speech recognition is a little like raising a child. Children are born with a tremendous amount of intelligence, however they need continual nurturing and guidance from their parents and family to learn right from wrong. So it is with speech recognition. When I was working as a certified consultant for Dragon Systems, I would get a lot of casual users who were intrigued by speech recognition. They would go to their local computer superstore and pick up the entry level version, bring it home and without any prior experience or knowledge of how the software truly works, they would expect to be dictating at 100% accuracy all the time without putting in any real effort. I would then get calls and emails saying " I bought this and it doesn't work." I would inevitably write back asking if they made corrections when the software made mistakes. Almost invariably, I would either discover that they weren't correcting at all or, were simply just dictating or typing over mistakes. This is not the way to run the railroad!
So now that that tirade is over (for the moment :-)), let's discuss speech recognition alternatives. In the world of speech recognition software for PCs, there are basically two alternatives. You can get Windows Vista with its built in speech software or, you can get Dragon Naturallyspeaking. If you're on a Mac and you want more than command and control and control abilities that can be found in OS X itself, you want to check out a company called Macspeech. I have not personally had a chance to review their software firsthand as of yet, but I hope to sometime in the near future. When I do, I will post my observations here.
Windows Speech Recognition, as previously stated, is speech recognition built into Windows Vista. It works fairly well provided you have enough RAM. If you're going to be doing any kind of speech recognition, you want at least 1 GB or more of RAM on Windows Vista! Vista's speech recognition is not just for dictation: there is also fairly decent command and control capabilities as well. For those of you unaware of what Command And Control is, it's the ability to bring up programs by speech and then interact with them in the same way (without having to use the mouse or keyboard.) As good as Windows speech recognition is, it does lack some more useful features that are found in Dragon Naturallyspeaking.
Naturallyspeaking Preferred includes text to speech technology to allow documents to be read. It also includes the ability to create simple macros to enter text. For example, in Naturallyspeaking, I have a amacro called " write my e-mail address". So whenever I say that command, guess what happens? There is no such commitments in Windows Speech Recognition. If I want to dictate my e-mail address, I have to go in to "typing mode" by saying "start typing". I can then spell out my e-mail address. Not quite as elegant as in Naturallyspeaking, is it? Windows Speech Recognition is analogous to Dragon Naturallyspeaking Standard Edition. It is possible to move the mouse by speech in Windows Speech Recognition, however, it's not always as seamless or as accurate for me as in Naturallyspeaking. This doesn't mean that mouse control by speech doesn't work in Windows Speech Recognition. It most certainly does. The process is just a little more elegant in Dragon NaturallySpeaking. Microsoft also doesn't currently offer any add-ons for their speech product. They do offer development tools for application designers, but that's not quite the same thing.
What if you're a medical professional and need an extensive medical vocabulary? Windows Speech Recognition offers no way to create such a vocabulary. Yes, you can add individual words to your vocabulary but for a large scale vocabulary of specialized terminology, this would be extremely time consuming. Dragon Naturallyspeaking Medical Solutions is the only way to go in that case, likewise with the legal profession. Windows speech recognition also offers no way to create an advanced scripting commands to perform complex tasks. This functionality can only be found in dragon Naturallyspeaking professional edition. And if you need the ability to automate tasks beyond a simple text macro, you really need Naturallyspeaking professional at this point. Having said that, no one really knows what Microsoft might add to Windows Speech Recognition in the future. The product is built into windows and that could be a tremendous advantage for the company. The Windows Speech Recognition is very much a first generation product, so we can expect further development from here on out. NaturallySpeaking 9 is compatible with Windows Vista for most editions via a free downloadable patch (9.5). (Scroll down to NaturallySpeaking section.) Patches for the professional, legal, and medical versions of Naturallyspeaking are coming.
What speech recognition is and is not.
Gene Roddenberry first introduced the general public to the notion of talking to computers in September of 1966. The crew of the Starship Enterprise enjoyed flawless voice driven interaction with the ship's computer. The system never made mistakes; required correction during the dictation of a log entry, or, seemed to need any special maintenance of any kind. It could be used by voice by many different people simultaneously. Those of you who know me, know that I'm into science fiction. You may not however, understand exactly why.
Growing up as someone with cerebral palsy, I had to face many limitations. Although I can paint and draw fairly well, my brain injury makes writing physically difficult, laborious, time consuming, and, eligible. My vision problem, which is also caused by my CP, makes driving a car both impractical and unsafe. The welfare system and social structures in place in our society today mean that our government neither expects or demands much from its disabled citizens. "As long as you just want to sit home and play with your Xbox and don't demand much out of life, we'll keep sending you money but don't expect much else from us in the way of help." This seems to be the general attitude of those in power. I assure you though, that this is only due to a lack of knowledge.
Star Trek and other shows like it show us the way things must become. In star trek for example, Geordi Laforge may be blind, but he has been provided with the appropriate technology to overcome his limitations. He wasn't expected to pay for it. The appropriate piece of technology was simply provided to him that might become a more productive member of society. Moreover, as chief engineer of the USS Enterprise D., Laforge is expected to perform his duties regardless of any limitations he might have had at birth. His crew mates expect this of him and he in turn demands this of himself. In the world of Star Trek, no one drives. They simply have a way to transport everyone safely and conveniently. In Doctor Who, if the Doctor meets someone with three heads and six arms, he's not going to say " oh god, you have three heads and six arms!" He's more likely to simply say " lovely to see you again. I haven't seen you in so long!" And that's why I watch science fiction. I'm not always interested in who's attacking our heroes this week. Although I do enjoy a good story, I'm interested in the technological and sociological messages behind these things. I don't mind telling you that I believe in miracles and I wait expectantly for the manifestation of life altering, liberating technologies.
When I was young, speech recognition was just such a technology; something to be reached for; a potential solution to my problems, but nothing more.
Today, we have speech recognition technology, but what is it really like? Does it match up to the vision holdout by Star Trek? We are getting there. Right now though, all speech recognition technology works by analyzing sound waves. It also to looks at the surroundings sentences and judges the statistical likelihood that certain words will appear next to each other. The effect of this is as if the system is playing charades. Let's say that your dictating a sentence in a letter and you want to write a sentence that says, " john, I'll meet you there." The minute you start speaking, these speech recognition software is attempting to judge exactly what it was you said. It has fractions of a second to do this because you're obviously going to want to dictate something else or go to another program, etc. So the first thing the software does is say to itself, " I noticed the name John several times in this letter. So I'd have to guess that's who this is for. And then it sounds like he dictated something that sounds like I'll eat new where." Speech recognition systems only learn to improve by proper correction. It is therefore, extremely important to follow the appropriate correction method so that the software learns from its mistakes. Otherwise, it will never improve! This isn't Star Trek! Speech recognition systems require ongoing correction to learn. It is not teaching the software anything for you to simply highlight the misunderstood text and type in the corrections by hand. Although most software packages can learn from document analysis, the best way to teach speech recognition software is to make corrections by voice. This is after all, speech recognition software and therefore it needs to hear the appropriate things to tell it that it's made mistakes! Only in this way will the software ever improve! I cannot stress this enough! When you buy and or use speech recognition software, ask for training on how to use the software appropriately. Take any tutorials that come with the software until you feel comfortable using it. Learn the appropriate correction commands! Most importantly, understand that working with speech recognition is a little like raising a child. Children are born with a tremendous amount of intelligence, however they need continual nurturing and guidance from their parents and family to learn right from wrong. So it is with speech recognition. When I was working as a certified consultant for Dragon Systems, I would get a lot of casual users who were intrigued by speech recognition. They would go to their local computer superstore and pick up the entry level version, bring it home and without any prior experience or knowledge of how the software truly works, they would expect to be dictating at 100% accuracy all the time without putting in any real effort. I would then get calls and emails saying " I bought this and it doesn't work." I would inevitably write back asking if they made corrections when the software made mistakes. Almost invariably, I would either discover that they weren't correcting at all or, were simply just dictating or typing over mistakes. This is not the way to run the railroad!
So now that that tirade is over (for the moment :-)), let's discuss speech recognition alternatives. In the world of speech recognition software for PCs, there are basically two alternatives. You can get Windows Vista with its built in speech software or, you can get Dragon Naturallyspeaking. If you're on a Mac and you want more than command and control and control abilities that can be found in OS X itself, you want to check out a company called Macspeech. I have not personally had a chance to review their software firsthand as of yet, but I hope to sometime in the near future. When I do, I will post my observations here.
Windows Speech Recognition, as previously stated, is speech recognition built into Windows Vista. It works fairly well provided you have enough RAM. If you're going to be doing any kind of speech recognition, you want at least 1 GB or more of RAM on Windows Vista! Vista's speech recognition is not just for dictation: there is also fairly decent command and control capabilities as well. For those of you unaware of what Command And Control is, it's the ability to bring up programs by speech and then interact with them in the same way (without having to use the mouse or keyboard.) As good as Windows speech recognition is, it does lack some more useful features that are found in Dragon Naturallyspeaking.
Naturallyspeaking Preferred includes text to speech technology to allow documents to be read. It also includes the ability to create simple macros to enter text. For example, in Naturallyspeaking, I have a amacro called " write my e-mail address". So whenever I say that command, guess what happens? There is no such commitments in Windows Speech Recognition. If I want to dictate my e-mail address, I have to go in to "typing mode" by saying "start typing". I can then spell out my e-mail address. Not quite as elegant as in Naturallyspeaking, is it? Windows Speech Recognition is analogous to Dragon Naturallyspeaking Standard Edition. It is possible to move the mouse by speech in Windows Speech Recognition, however, it's not always as seamless or as accurate for me as in Naturallyspeaking. This doesn't mean that mouse control by speech doesn't work in Windows Speech Recognition. It most certainly does. The process is just a little more elegant in Dragon NaturallySpeaking. Microsoft also doesn't currently offer any add-ons for their speech product. They do offer development tools for application designers, but that's not quite the same thing.
What if you're a medical professional and need an extensive medical vocabulary? Windows Speech Recognition offers no way to create such a vocabulary. Yes, you can add individual words to your vocabulary but for a large scale vocabulary of specialized terminology, this would be extremely time consuming. Dragon Naturallyspeaking Medical Solutions is the only way to go in that case, likewise with the legal profession. Windows speech recognition also offers no way to create an advanced scripting commands to perform complex tasks. This functionality can only be found in dragon Naturallyspeaking professional edition. And if you need the ability to automate tasks beyond a simple text macro, you really need Naturallyspeaking professional at this point. Having said that, no one really knows what Microsoft might add to Windows Speech Recognition in the future. The product is built into windows and that could be a tremendous advantage for the company. The Windows Speech Recognition is very much a first generation product, so we can expect further development from here on out. NaturallySpeaking 9 is compatible with Windows Vista for most editions via a free downloadable patch (9.5). (Scroll down to NaturallySpeaking section.) Patches for the professional, legal, and medical versions of Naturallyspeaking are coming.
02 March, 2007
Notice of updates
This is just a quick to note to let you all know that I very often update previous posts with new information as I learn it. With this in mind, please check back on post that you think you've already read, as there may be new important revisions. I feel it's important to update my articles periodically to provide the most accurate information possible. To that end, all of my previous posts have now been updated with new information.
Thank you
Thank you
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
